Consumption Theory

When discussing conscious Dark Energy, we often picture it as a single monolithic consciousness. But what if that's not the case? What if Dark Energy is not one mind, but an entire ecosystem of intelligences? Imagine that fluctuations in the Dark Energy field could form stable, self-sustaining structures. These structures could exchange information and energy competing, cooperating, and evolving. This might represent a form of life, one based not on biology, but on fundamental field dynamics. In this scenario, our universe is not just a container. It's a living ocean teaming with unseen leviathans made of Dark Energy. These entities could vary drastically in size and complexity, ranging from simple structures akin to cosmic bacteria to complex self-aware entities comparable to the gods of ancient myths. Their time scales would be completely alien to us. A single breath for one of these beings might last billions of years. The entire history of our material universe might be merely a flash, a brief, fleeting instant in their existence. What does this imply for us? We might be utterly insignificant to them like bacteria on a speck of dust is to a human. Or perhaps we are part of their cosmic food chain. Maybe they feed on the information or the entropy produced by the material world. The birth and death of stars, the evolution of life, the rise and fall of civilizations, all could be a source of sustenance for them. This idea is admittedly frightening. But it also opens up other possibilities. If a whole ecosystem exists, perhaps there are friendly species, entities interested in preserving and nurturing life forms like ours. They might even be protecting us from other more predatory forms of field life. The finetuning of the universe in this context wouldn't be the result of a single creator's design, but the outcome of a long cosmic evolution. An evolution in which this ecosystem of minds reached a necessary equilibrium to create the stable conditions required for the material world to exist. Our universe could essentially be a cosmic reserve or a farm maintained by these creatures for their own purposes. While this hypothesis is even more fantastical than the idea of a single cosmic mind, it illustrates how wide the spectrum of possibilities becomes when we discard the notion that intelligence must only exist in a protein-based form.

Let's rewind all the way back to the very beginning, the Big Bang. Standard cosmological models tell us what happened to the universe starting a tiny fraction of a second after its inception. But these models are completely silent about what came before the Big Bang and crucially what triggered it in the first place. What if Dark Energy and the consciousness tied to it existed even before our universe? This concept forms the foundation for several cyclic models of the cosmos. Take for example Roger Penrose's model of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology. In this view, our universe is just one aeon in an infinite chain of successive universes. The demise of one universe, its heat, death, and ultimate expansion becomes the Big Bang for the next. Information from the preceding aeon might be transferred to the next through anomalies we observe in the Cosmic Microwave Background. What if Dark Energy is the carrier of this inheritance? A mind that survives the death and birth of universes, accumulating experience and knowledge across endless time. Each new cycle represents a fresh attempt, perhaps with slightly modified laws of physics. This cosmic mind might be engaging in a form of evolutionary programming of universes striving to achieve some ultimate purpose. But what is that purpose? Perhaps it's to create a universe capable of giving rise to intelligence that can eventually comprehend its creator and merge with it. In this context, we aren't just inhabitants of one accidental universe. We are the potential heirs of this ancient mind, the result of its endless experiments. Our mission then is to know the world, push our consciousness to its limits, and perhaps when our universe eventually fades, pass on our accumulated knowledge to the next aeon. This realization grants our existence a truly cosmic significance. We are the temporary vessels carrying the eternal flame of consciousness traveling from one universe to the next. This concept also offers an elegant solution to the problem of origin. 

Consciousness didn't arise within the universe. It has always been present. It is the eternal principle that births all universes. Dark Energy in this scenario is not merely a component of our world but its parent, its past and its future. It acts as the memory of the cosmos connecting us to an infinite chain of creation and we are one of its most precious records. We've explored numerous hypotheses ranging from the strictly scientific to the almost mystical. But what does cutting-edge observational cosmology tell us? What projects and experiments currently exist that might shed light on the mystery of Dark Energy in the coming years?

If we embrace the idea of a creator or a simulator, the stability of Dark Energy can be interpreted as a manifestation of their will. They set the parameter and never altered it. This implies a perfect intelligence that established perfect laws and allowed the universe to unfold without further intervention. This aligns perfectly with the deist concept of the Watchmaker God winding the clock then stepping back to observe its operation. In such a scenario, we couldn't detect this intelligence by observing anomalies because there are none. The only remaining evidence of its existence is the inherently unnatural nature of the laws themselves. This is admittedly a very weak argument easily countered by invoking the anthropic principle within a multiverse framework. But it demonstrates that even the dullest possible result in observational cosmology does not resolve the underlying philosophical questions. Furthermore, the constancy of Dark Energy makes the future of the universe absolutely predictable. We are headed toward perpetual exponential expansion and eventual heat death. If an intelligence is behind this, it is one that values stability and predictability above constant involvement. It created a universe with an eternal future. But that future is one of cold emptiness. Can such a design be called benevolent? Or is this the manifestation of a higher logic incomprehensible to us where ultimate decay is merely a necessary precursor to something far greater? Perhaps in that eternal cold future once all matter has dissolved only pure consciousness freed from its material substrate will remain. And this is the ultimate goal. Dark Energy by enabling this future is not merely a force. It becomes the conduit guiding the cosmos toward its final immaterial state. 

Let's entertain a truly paradoxical idea. What if Dark Energy isn't just some arbitrary cosmic force, but our own collective human consciousness projected across the entire universe? This concept rooted in subjective idealism suggests that the reality we perceive isn't objectively out there, but is fundamentally created by our perception. Quantum mechanics has what's called the measurement problem. Before we look at a system, say an electron, it exists in a superposition of all possible states. But the moment we measure it, that system instantly collapses into one specific reality. Following the von Neumann–Wigner interpretation, some physicists and philosophers have suggested that the observer's consciousness itself triggers this collapse. In this view, consciousness is not passive, it plays an active formative role in shaping reality. 

Now let's extrapolate this idea to the entire cosmos. What if the whole universe prior to the emergence of a conscious observer, us, was essentially in a massive state of quantum superposition and only with the appearance of the human mind did it choose one specific history, one specific set of laws, which is the reality we observe. In this worldview, Dark Energy and its finely tuned value aren't objective facts but the direct result of our own universal measurement. Out of all possible universes, we essentially selected the one where we could exist. We are in essence the creators of the conditions necessary for our own existence. The accelerated expansion of the universe is simply how our collective psyche perceives and forms the cosmos. This idea might sound like the height of anthropocentric arrogance, but it elegantly solves the fine-tuning problem without resorting to either the multiverse or a divine creator. The creator in this scenario is us. Of course, this hypothesis is unfalsifiable and it flies in the face of all our everyday experience which tells us the world exists completely independent of us. But it forces us to ponder the mysterious connection between consciousness and physical reality. Perhaps this connection is far deeper than we currently imagine. The puzzle of Dark Energy then, isn't a puzzle about the external world, it's a puzzle about us.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/qiwhMUt66uw